A year after a regulation association was appointed to look into claims over the Duchess of Sussex’s cure of Palace staff, Her Majesty has made a stunning decision.
Is it in a mahogany desk drawer? Shoved at the back of a 70s metal submitting cupboard in an aide’s office? Squirreled away on the Buckingham Palace intranet Z drive?
Somewhere in the royal household proper now is one of the most contentious archives ever produced for the Queen – and a file which will now by no means see the mild of day.
This week, TheSunday Times broke the information that anything an backyard regulation company may have located throughout their investigation into allegations that Meghan, Duchess of Sussex had bullied group of workers will continue to be hidden from public view. The Duchess has usually vehemently denied the claims.
But what would possibly at first appear like Team Windsor sensibly tamping down a spark which ought to reignite combat with the rebellious duo is in fact a more loaded and doubtlessly explosive move.
Go returned to March, 2021 and there was only one royal story the world used to be speakme about: Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan having detonated a bomb beneath the Palace through their interview with Oprah Winfrey.
Over two hours, they laid out exceptionally negative accusations of racism and a wholesale push aside for their intellectual fitness from an group which had in truth thrown them to the media wolves.
However, much less than a week earlier than it aired (though it had been filmed), it had been Meghan who used to be in the line of fire after the The Times posted a bombshell story which alleged that Meghan had bullied royal staffers.
According to The Times’ Valentine Low, a bullying complaint had been made in October 2018 by their then-communications secretary Jason Knauf which alleged that the duchess had pushed “two personal assistants out of the family and was undermining the confidence of a third body of workers member.”
Low wrote that “Staff would on occasion be reduced to tears; one aide, anticipating a war of words with Meghan, told a colleague: “I can’t end shaking.”
Elsewhere the record stated that “Another former worker advised The Times they had been for my part ‘humiliated’ by using her and claimed that two members of body of workers had been bullied.
“Another aide claimed it felt ‘more like emotional cruelty and manipulation, which I wager should additionally be called bullying.’”
A spokesman for the Sussexes argued that the allegations had been phase of “a calculated smear campaign,” in accordance to The Times, and that Meghan was once “saddened by using this ultra-modern assault on her character, specifically as any individual who has been the goal of bullying herself and is deeply committed to helping these who have skilled pain and trauma”.
The day after the record got here out, Buckingham Palace announced that they had launched an investigation into the claims. Later the equal month it was printed that the Palace had hired an outdoor law firm to take over the probe.
Then got here Oprah and amid the global media melee that followed, these bullying allegations generally disappeared from view. That is largely how things have stayed in the intervening year. There have been a scant few tales about the investigation and only a scattering of information. This situation had quite much long past cold.
That is until this week when The Sunday Times’ Roya Nikkhah published that the record “has been buried”.
“The findings from the notably sensitive inquiry, which used to be paid for privately by means of the Queen and performed by using an impartial regulation firm, will in no way be published,” Nikkhah wrote.
While no small print have emerged about what the unnamed law firm might have observed or not found, the “investigation … has led to Buckingham Palace ‘improving the policies and procedures’ in its HR department, according to royal sources.”
However, thought it had been idea the HR policy adjustments would be blanketed in the next Sovereign Grant report, out this month, the Palace “no longer plans to make any public announcement on the inquiry, or even publicly acknowledge the subsequent changes to its HR policies.”
One issue contributing to the Palace’s choice to tuck the document away, Nikkhah wrote, was “to limit tensions between the Sussexes and the palace”.
Outwardly this appears like the mature play on the part of the Queen here. Why stoke the flames and drag this specific commercial enterprise returned into the spotlight? Better to tidy it away to maintain what is left of the frayed ties between London and Montecito.
But whether or not intentionally or not, in retaining schtum about anything conclusions the attorneys have come to, Her Majesty has in fact done her granddaughter-in-law a disservice and damned Meghan.
0 Comments