A US-based decide stated legal professionals should grill Prince Harry and Meghan Markle for their remarks about Samantha Markle made at some point of their Oprah Winfrey interview.
The ruling came after the royal couple's lawyers refused to respond to questions posed by Samantha's lawyers.
According to express.co.uk, Markle's lawyers have requested the choose to quit the process, however, Ms Honeywell has refused, claiming that the Court will likely "dismiss the action in it's entirety".
Judge Charlene Edwards ruled, "Defendant Markle does not show that unusual circumstances justify the requested stay, or that prejudice or an undue burden will end result if the Court does not impose a stay."
She added: "Although a preliminary peek at the action to dismiss suggests that some of the claims in opposition to her may also be ripe for dismissal, the review does not reveal, at this time, a clear indication that the Court will dismiss the motion in its entirety."
'Thus, defendant Markle does now not fulfill the high preferred required to continue to be discovery pending the resolution of a dispositive motion.'
Samantha,Meghan's 1/2 sister, is claiming $75,000 in damages for the Oprah claims, as properly as the claims made in the couple's 2020 biography Finding Freedom.
Finding Freedom, an unauthorized biography of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, was once co-authored with the aid of Omid Scobie.
Tags: Queen, Prince Charles, Camilla, Prince Louis, Prince William and Kate Middleton, Prince Charles, Prince Harry, Meghan, Lilibet
Make positive you in no way leave out a ROYAL story! Sign up to our e-newsletter to get all of our celebrity, royal and life-style information delivered at once to your inbox.
0 Comments