There’s a very American reason for why Prince Harry needs police safety in the UK: guns.

The Queen may want to locate herself celebrating her seventieth year on the British throne barring all of her household via her side, as Prince Harry has claimed that it’s too hazardous for the Sussexes to visit the UK under the modern-day security arrangements.

What does Harry desire to protect his wife and youngsters that his employed bodyguards can’t currently provide in the UK?

There’s one obvious, all-American answer: guns.

Unbeknownst to the public, for months the Duke of Sussex has been petitioning the UK government to allow him to pay for police protection for himself and his household while they are in the country. Harry was once stripped of police security when he and his wife, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, stepped back from existence as working individuals of the royal household in 2020 — now he’s inclined to pursue criminal motion in order to get it back.

On Jan. 16, the Mail on Sunday mentioned that Harry’s lawyers filed a request for a judicial assessment of the UK Home Office’s choice to bar the Sussexes from police protection. Depending on the consequences of the review, the count number may want to go before a High Court judge.

In response to what the Sussexes’ spokesperson known as “a leak in a UK tabloid, with surreptitious timing,” they rapidly released a assertion to set “the facts right.”

“Prince Harry inherited a safety hazard at birth, for life,” the spokesperson said. “He remains sixth in line to the throne, served two tours of fight duty in Afghanistan, and in latest years his family has been subjected to well-documented neo-Nazi and extremist threats. While his position within the institution has changed, his profile as a member of the royal household has not. Nor has the danger to him and his family.

“The Duke and Duchess of Sussex in my opinion fund a personal protection team for their family, but that safety cannot replicate the critical police protection wished even as in the UK. In the absence of such protection, Prince Harry and his household are unable to return to his home.”

The spokesperson stated the duke’s safety was compromised due to the absence of police safety whilst leaving a charity tournament at some point of a go to to the UK in July — although no additional records was once given, even after a in addition request by BuzzFeed News, about precisely what came about during this supposed 2021 protection breach. After a subsequent failed try at negotiations with the Home Office, the Sussexes’ legal professionals filed the formal request for judicial evaluation in September.

“As is broadly known, others who have left public office and have an inherent chance risk acquire police safety at no fee to them. The aim for Prince Harry has been easy – to make certain the protection of himself and his household while in the UK so his children can be aware of his domestic country,” said the spokesperson.

Of course, like any Harry and Meghan news, this sparked a media firestorm. Sussex critics accused Harry of overinflating the danger and seeking royal perks after rejecting reputable royal work. Sussex supporters pointed to Princess Diana’s lack of legitimate police protection following her divorce and the function that might also have performed in her death.

Harry’s declare that he, Meghan, and their two small youngsters can’t be safe in the UK besides police officers guarding their backs may additionally appear a bit unusual when you reflect onconsideration on the fact that the country’s prosperous and famous stay in security with their private protection teams.

But personal security guards in the UK cannot carry guns.

Until last year, Harry had continually been blanketed in the UK by using an elite — and armed — branch of the Metropolitan Police Service acknowledged as SO14, or the Royalty Protection Group. These taxpayer-funded guards grant 24/7 protection to the high-profile individuals of the royal household (the Queen, Prince Charles, the Cambridge family) and accompany different individuals of the royal household in addition down in the line of succession to legitimate events and visits.

Only a pick team of high-profile individuals, such as modern-day and former top ministers and overseas heads of state, are allowed to have police safety (and therefore armed protection) in the UK — and the Home Office ought to supply its consent.

“Firearms are no longer an suited skill of protection in Great Britain,” the December 2021 Home Office information on firearm licensing states. “It has been the view of successive governments for many years that the private possession and carriage of firearms for non-public protection is in all likelihood to lead to an increase in tiers of violence.”

Tags: Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, Buckingham Palace, royal family, Princess Diana

Make positive you in no way leave out a ROYAL story! Sign up to our e-newsletter to get all of our celebrity, royal and life-style information delivered at once to your inbox.